It’s kind of a running joke here at the law school where I work that lunchtime can be feast or famine. Some days you’re lucky if you can grab a stale granola bar or some Pirate Booty from the snack tray in our department, while other days there’s leftover pizza, In-N-Out burgers, and yellow curry coming our way from all the midday programming events that are going on. Neither of these extremes is particularly healthy, but I’m always grateful for any form of sustenance I can get since I’ve never been great at making and packing a lunch for work. Such a thing for me connotes meal planning, and meal planning is an activity I’ve just never been drawn to. In my mind, meal planning means spending all Sunday at the supermarket and then being stuck in the kitchen laboring over cookbooks and a hot stove. A lofty goal, but never a practical one when I only have minutes to spare.Read More
For many years, improving civility among lawyers has been a serious concern for the legal profession, including in California. In response, the State Bar, district courts, local bar associations, and other legal organizations have published civility codes and guidelines to help lawyers better understand what type of behavior is considered civil and professional. Unfortunately, many lawyers inaccurately view these publications as having little consequence if not followed. Such viewpoints are gravely misplaced.Read More
The San Diego Superior Court launched a local Judicial Mentor Program (JMP) last year to encourage the development of a well-qualified and diverse judicial applicant pool with a varied background of legal practice areas.Read More
California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 requires that attorneys provide competent representation to their clients. This includes “the duty to keep abreast of the changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology.” Cal. Rule of Prof’l Cond., Rule 1.1, Comment 1.Read More
Apparently, in 2022, despite years of progress and women entering the legal profession at a rate of 51% compared to men, misogyny is alive and well — though perhaps less overtly than was tolerated in the past. However, the current Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), in effect since Nov. 1, 2018, provide for the State Bar to take disciplinary action against lawyers engaging in discriminatory conduct of any kind against anyone when acting in their capacity as a lawyer. The former RPC dealing with virtually all types of unlawful discrimination by lawyers, 2-400, was a weak and rarely-used basis for discipline, and only applied to the “management or operation” of a law practice. Specifically, a 2-400 violation was not even actionable by the Office of Chief Trial Counsel unless it was first “found to be unlawful by an appropriate civil administrative or judicial tribunal under applicable state or federal law. Until there is a finding of civil unlawfulness, there is no basis for disciplinary action under this rule.”Read More
