On June 24, 2021, a New York court immediately suspended Rudi Giuliani’s law license, based on “uncontroverted evidence that [he] communicated demonstrable false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers and the public at large in his capacity as lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump and the Trump campaign in connection with Trump’s failed effort at reelection in 2020.”
Understanding and adhering to statutory and ethical standards in the arbitration setting is critical to preserve the neutrality and integrity of the private system of adjudication.
This article focuses on some of the ethical considerations a lawyer should consider when deciding to use overdraft protection.
Despite the unprecedented events occurring since, many of us still remember March 2019 when it was made public that “Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III delivered his Report of the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election to the then-Attorney General of the United States, William P. Barr.”
It is no secret that trial attorneys must navigate ethical minefields as they collect information from their clients, as they engage in discovery, and as they present evidence to judges and juries.
8 Tidbits of Advice from an International Student Turned U.S. Lawyer
February 15, 2024
Tips from the Bench: Hon. Jill L. Burkhardt
February 15, 2024
February 15, 2024
Application of CRPC 1.15 to Government Lawyers
February 20, 2024
January 19, 2024